Buildings, Vol. 16, Pages 2757: Influence of Reinforcement Configuration on the Flexural Performance of Hybrid GFRP–Steel-Reinforced Beams

Buildings, Vol. 16, Pages 2757: Influence of Reinforcement Configuration on the Flexural Performance of Hybrid GFRP–Steel-Reinforced Beams

Buildings doi: 10.3390/buildings16142757

Authors:
Atılgan Şahin
Şule Bakırcı Er

This study investigates the flexural behavior, load-carrying capacity, and crack propagation of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and steel bars. To evaluate the structural performance, concrete beam specimens with cross-sectional dimensions of 150 mm × 300 mm and a total length of 2050 mm were fabricated using a design concrete compressive strength of 35 MPa and tested under flexural loading. Each tested specimen featured a distinct hybrid reinforcement configuration to investigate the influence of bar arrangement on the mechanical behavior. Flexural cracks were systematically monitored using a crack-width comparator gauge at specific loading stages, accounting for key milestones such as ultimate load capacity and sudden load drops. The experimental findings were complemented by an analytical model to validate the performance parameters and predict the ultimate capacity. The results demonstrate that the specific configuration and arrangement of hybrid reinforcement significantly influence the post-cracking stiffness and crack growth. Specifically, the hybrid configuration effectively balances the ductile response of steel with the brittle behavior of GFRP, achieving significant control over serviceability crack widths and an enhanced ultimate load-carrying capacity. Experimental results indicated that for elements exhibiting identical axial stiffness, the reinforcement layering configuration provided a 66% improvement in the deformability factor alongside a 10% enhancement in the load-carrying capacity. It is recommended that the steel tension reinforcement be positioned in the inner layer at a spacing of about two times the GFRP bar diameter to mitigate corrosion risks. Additionally, it was established that the theoretical load capacity accounted for 70% to 86% of the experimental load capacity.